Gap between intent and implementation
2014
supplychainforesight respondents ranked lack of relevant skills and talent as
the number one strategic business constraint. Whilst skills
development of employees ranked as a top area for investment for long term gain in supplychainforesight 2015, this is seen as an
area of clear intent but lack of implementation.
This article outlines the necessity for
bridging this gap.
Arming for Change
Why is there a hesitation on the part of
organisations to invest in skills if possessing relevant skills is identified
as having the biggest positive impact on achieving a sustainable future?
Since “Identifying and managing change” is the top strategic objective in
this year’s supplychainforesight survey, what strategic constraints were
identified as preventing this from happening? The top 3 were: - (lack of) willingness
to change/breaking old habits/relationships, supply chain information and intelligence
and reactive vs. proactive approach.
These constraints can be addressed by
training, provided it is understood that training is a process which will lead
to changes in behaviour, performance or both. Of these constraints, the second (supply
chain information and intelligence) is a
technical competency which will require some theory and a great deal of
practice to impart. Such a need responds well to formal training.
The first and last constraints (willingness
to change/breaking old habits/relationships and reactive vs. proactive approach)
provide the biggest opportunity for business sustainability because they are
attitudinal. They inevitably require substantial behavioural and cultural
changes which in turn indicate a more holistic approach aimed at both the
organisation and the individuals in it.
Change initiatives are time consuming and
costly, significantly impacting the organisation’s drive toward success. Since
we are living in a climate of rapid and radical change, supply chain
organisations need to resolve how to successfully adapt and sustain change.
The first step requires
the whole company to participate in workshops whose purpose is to identify why
there is a need to change. Unless each person within the organisation can see
for him or herself what is happening out there to necessitate changes in the
way the company does its business, very little will happen. Such recognition
can only be achieved through participation at all levels in workshops where
senior management identifies strategic threats and opportunities whilst those
at the coalface recommend the changes needed to deal with them.
By incorporating these
recommendations into the company’s future strategy, top management will win the
hearts and minds of those who must behave differently if the initiatives are to
deliver and sustain their strategic benefits.
Whilst this
consultative approach to developing organisational strategy will identify the
need to change, it must also identify the measurable indicators which will show
that the organisation has achieved its change goals and the target dates by
which they need to be achieved.
At the heart of this method
lies the identification of the key skills which will transform the
organisation. An adaption of an old saying is very apt, “To change into what
we’ve never been before, we need to do what we’ve never done before”. To do what we’ve never done before means
acquiring the relevant skills to do those things and this is where the winners
emerge from the pack. Companies that will thrive in this climate of radical
change are those which are aggressively upskilling each team member so that
they are equipped and confident to thrive in a changed environment. This means
not only the acquisition of new, “hard” technical skills but also the “soft”
skills needed to adapt to change.
One of the most
exciting things about managing change is that the job is never done: no sooner
have we transformed the organisation to meet one set of changes than there will
be a new set of changes facing us.
In conclusion, the important factor that makes organisations effective at change is having
a culture that embraces continual change. After all, delivering strategic
change is only half of the story. The other half is all about sustaining the
change.
Is your organisation proactive or reactive
when it comes to change?
What steps are you taking to bring about a
culture of change in your organisations?
What skills do you see as being key to a sustainable future in the supply chain management field?
What skills do you see as being key to a sustainable future in the supply chain management field?
In todays ever changing political, social and business the ability to adapt to change has become more important than ever before. The reality of the matter is that it is increasingly becoming difficult to be proactive due to the fast pace of change. I think what matters is how the organisations reacts to change in cases where the organisation fails to be proactive.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very thought provoking statement, More. What role do you think that SETAs can play in facilitating change within the organisations which are their levy payers and providers which they accredit?
ReplyDeleteExcellent website you have here, so much cool information!..
ReplyDeleteTom Cris
I agree 100%
ReplyDelete