Monday 11 August 2014

Implementing Training for Maximum Impact

Introduction
The most exciting developments in the growing of organisational competencies have been in training implementation- making sure that, once training is delivered, it has maximum impact. In this article we explore innovations which will substantially enhance returns on training investments.

The Secret
According to research done by Stanford University, the amount of knowledge generated in the last 30 years is equivalent to the amount of knowledge generated in the rest of human history.

“Textbooks are becoming out-dated by the time they are printed. Curricula are no longer reliable records of what we know. Predictable career paths and stable worldviews are things of the past.

“In this constantly shifting knowledge landscape, learning how to think is becoming far more important than learning what  to think. This is a shift away from subject content towards a focus on thinking skills.”

Source: André Croucamp- Totem Media.

We now operate in a world where:

  •  information is readily and easily accessible;
  •  change is so rapid that traditional methods of training and education are totally inadequate; 
  • discipline based knowledge is equally inadequate for organisations to remain competitive;
  •  learning is increasingly aligned with what we do;
  • organisations require flexible learning practices; and
  •   there is a need for immediacy of learning


The secret to successful training implementation in this new environment starts with the assumption that every group of individuals involved in a training intervention will have greater access to information than any individual facilitator. In addition, real learning is a much more collaborative process among today’s learning population than it ever was. Coupled to this we also know that the best way of acquiring new skills comes from teaching those skills to others.

This leads to realisation that future training should be implemented in a way that embraces the simple and profound concept that any organisation has a collection of knowledge and experience which should be shared. It respects the fact that the training department may, at most, have 5-10% of the knowledge needed and used in the company. Organisational learning is taking place on a real-time basis - ever changing and becoming more valuable.


In such an environment, the relationship between traditional “homework” and “classwork” is flipped – homework is used by the individual to acquire knowledge and understanding (previously imparted in lectures) and contact sessions are used to apply what has been learnt in collaborative exercises.


This has a profound effect on the way in which successful training programmes are implemented.

The Keystone
Adaptation is key to survival- people want to learn and have a lifelong inclination to do so: learning is natural, "like breathing" and it is an internal process carried out by all of us, every second of every day.

At the heart of any organisational training is the need to change individual behaviour:
  • for targeted individuals to acquire new skills;
  • for the individuals concerned to change current practices to take on board changes in client needs, legislation, company strategy, or other developments.
Using their natural instincts to learn, individuals must be equipped to face challenges and solve problems to which they had previously not been exposed.

Implementation of this new type of training involves a process in which individuals take the initiative, in collaboration with their colleagues, in analysing problems, formulating desired outcomes, identifying the resources required to achieve these outcomes, choosing and implementing solution based strategies and evaluating the objectives achieved.

The stimulus to such a learning processes is the setting of problems where, by working towards solutions, individuals either acquire new sets of knowledge, skills and attitudes or use those which they already have in innovative ways. Thus the finding of the learner’s own solutions brings about the required changes of behaviour.

Whilst radical changes are needed to transform training implementation through these suggestions, the bottom line benefits are clear: what is needed is the organisation’s appetite for innovation. 

Do your organisation’s training programmes lead to higher levels of productivity.

Would the flipped classroom methodology be of benefit to your organisation’s truing effectiveness.

In your opinion, what is needed to make your organisation’s training implementation more effective?

Let’s share ideas..

8 comments:

  1. In order to improve productivity firms must develop an innovative approach to performance management, which helps companies ope-rationalize their strategic priorities. This is not easy and hence innovation is required to deal with organizational constraints:

    Focus staff on managing efficiently the customer contact points
    Make management more productive by providing information and structure around the key operating areas; production, delivery and promotion.
    Given the complexity of these tasks and luck of experience to deal with such issues, training and guidance is needed. This is a very innovative approach to managing productivity as it aligns the whole organization around key productivity goals.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Key to your comment is the alignment of training interventions with company strategy. How to achieve this?

    ReplyDelete
  3. When strategically applied, continuous learning fosters knowledge and
    skills acquisition to help the organization achieve its goals. HR’s role is to
    establish and implement a high-level road-map for strategic training and
    development. The starting point is an in-depth understanding of the business environment, knowledge of the organization’s goals and insight regarding training and development options. HR must then develop strategic learning imperatives (high-level, learning-related actions that an organization takes to be competitive)that align with business goals. Differences in industry, business goals, human capital skills and resources influence the selection of learning imperatives.
    Below are some examples.

    1. Diversify the learning portfolio.
    2.Expand the view of whom to train.
    3.Accelerate the pace of employee
    learning.
    4. Prepare employees to deal better
    with customers.
    5.Ensure that employees believe
    there are opportunities to learn and
    grow.
    6.Effectively capture and share
    knowledge.
    7. Diagnose and modify the work
    environment to support transfer
    and learning.

    ReplyDelete
  4. HR is propositioned to make exceptionally valuable contributions to the firm when it comes to strategy implementation.
    • HR has an organization-wide purview, i.e., unlike other corporate functions, HR is involved
    in and generally understands the business in its entirety.
    • Strategy implementation is inherently a human issue; HR by its very title has deep
    responsibilities in this territory.

    ReplyDelete
  5. These are both very valuable sets of comments, thank you very much Sinothando. In your experience how much of what you say should be the role of HR/ Training in an organisation actually applied?

    ReplyDelete
  6. In my experience continuous learning is dependent on the individual the training department needs to ensure the tools are there to provide continuous learning and development and reading your blog I learnt a fact that the training department may, at most, have 5-10% of the knowledge needed and used in the company. Organisational learning is taking place on a real-time basis - ever changing and becoming more valuable.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is a very informative blog. My opinion for awareness and emotional intelligence training is that it must be done individually with each person and after that worked into the group.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks very much for this Richard. Do you believe that Emotional Intelligence (EI) training should be spread across a whole organisation or that it will enhance productivity if provided to specific target groups? If so which groups?
    Typically, how long does it take to impart EI skills?

    ReplyDelete